Fleet · Agentic execution harness
The pattern

Agentic execution inside the perimeter,
where the data already lives.

Fleet is a harness: the pattern and the underlying architecture for running agent work inside an organization's own environment. Work is queued, executed, reviewed by a person, and merged, and nothing crosses the account boundary to do it.

01

Why agentic delivery stalls

01

Execution happens outside the perimeter

Most agent platforms run the work in a vendor cloud. For a regulated organization, that turns an engineering decision into a security review, and the review often arrives after the budget is committed.

02

Demonstrated, not operated

A single impressive run is not a system. No durable state, no approval trail, no retry policy, no escalation path when work stalls overnight. Nothing that survives an audit.

03

The same foundation is rebuilt every time

Queue, sandbox, approval gate, source control integration, escalation. Every agentic build starts by reconstructing the same scaffolding, so the opening months of a program go to plumbing rather than the work it was funded for. Built once as a harness, that foundation carries into every engagement that follows, turning a cost repeated on each project into a repeatable revenue base across clients.

02

Fleet is a harness, not a product

Fleet is where agent work runs when it cannot leave the environment. It is not a place to track work. It is a place to do it.

A packaged product is bought, configured within its own model, and used as shipped. A harness is different. It is an architecture that other things are built on, and a pattern that repeats across builds rather than a system delivered once. Fleet has an interface, but the interface is the smallest part of it. The value is in the layer below.

Application layer
What gets built on the harness. Each one is a different job, not a different system.
Software ticket execution Pipeline remediation Semantic model maintenance Migration and conversion work Governance and policy tasks Add yours
Execution layer · This is Fleet
The components every agentic build needs, built once and reused. This is the layer that carries the value.
Pre-configured agent roles Durable work queue with state Agent execution sandbox Human approval gate Retry and escalation policy Branch, diff, merge Model Context Protocol interface
Platform layer
The host environment. It supplies compute, the model endpoint, identity, and the data the agents work against.
Snowflake account Snowpark Container Services Cortex model layer Snowflake roles and single sign on Databricks AWS

The harness needs three things from its host: container compute, a governed model endpoint, and enterprise identity. Any environment that provides them can run it. Snowflake is where Fleet is built and running now. Other governed environments are a port of the same pattern, not a new architecture.

03

How it works

A person describes the work. An agent picks it up, reads the codebase, plans the change, writes and tests it, and opens the result for review. Nothing merges without a human approval.

01

Create

Work described in plain language, with priority and scope.

02

Launch

An agent clones the repository and branches.

03

Execute

Implement, run the tests, commit.

04

Review

A person reads the diff. Approve, or reject with feedback.

05

Merge

Approved work merges and deploys.

On rejection
The agent retries with the reviewer's feedback in context, not from a blank start.
On failure
Three automated retries. After that the work escalates to a person as stalled.
Throughput
Work items execute in parallel, each on its own branch, independent of the others.
The approval gate

Full autonomy is not the objective. Every change carries a named human who approved it, and every rejection is recorded with its reason. That trail is what makes agentic delivery defensible in a regulated environment.

Open to other agents

Fleet exposes a Model Context Protocol server, so an agent outside Fleet can create work, launch it, and read the result. Fleet sits underneath the tools an organization already runs rather than replacing them.

04

What Fleet changes

Three things are different once the harness is running.

Change 01

Work that could not run, runs

Initiatives held up by data residency, egress, or model provider review proceed, because execution never leaves the account. The security question is answered by the architecture rather than negotiated case by case.

Change 02

Agent output becomes auditable

Every merged change carries a named approver, and every rejection is recorded with its reason. Agentic delivery stops being something to defend in review and becomes something with a trail behind it.

Change 03

The backlog moves without headcount

Well specified work executes in parallel and continuously. Delivery capacity stops being set by how many engineers are available on a given week.

05

Fleet and existing work management

Jira, from Atlassian, is the most widely deployed system of record for engineering work: tickets, priorities, assignees, sprints, reporting. Most organizations already run it, and Fleet does not replace it.

Jira now executes work as well as tracking it. Atlassian's Rovo Dev turns a work item into an execution surface, planning a change, updating code, running tests, and opening a merge ready pull request in an Atlassian managed cloud sandbox. Agents are assignable in the same way a person is. That capability went broad in May 2026.

The difference is not the feature. On features this converges, and quickly. The difference is where execution happens, what it sits next to, and how it is paid for.

AxisWork management platformFleet
Where code executesVendor managed cloud sandboxThe organization's own account, no egress
What the agents sit next toWork artifacts and connected applicationsThe data estate, model layer, and governance
CustomizationConfigured within the product's modelThe code is ours, so the harness bends to the customer
Cost shapePer seat plus metered AI creditsCompute and tokens, against a build cost
Time to first valueAlready deployed and in useRequires an engagement to stand up
Reach beyond engineeringService management, finance, marketingEngineering and data work
EcosystemMature marketplace and connector estateModel Context Protocol, platform native
Scale behind the roadmapA public software companyHakkoda and IBM

Jira is the incumbent for good reasons. It is already deployed, it reaches well beyond engineering, and its connector ecosystem is mature. Fleet does not compete on any of those and is not intended to. It competes on the one axis a regulated organization cannot compromise on, which is where the work is allowed to run.

Together, 01

The tracker stays

Jira remains the system of record. Work is defined, prioritized, and reported there, and none of that moves.

Together, 02

Execution routes by sensitivity

Work that can run in a vendor cloud stays there. Work touching regulated data, production pipelines, or anything that cannot cross the boundary routes to Fleet.

Together, 03

The two connect programmatically

The Model Context Protocol interface is the join. An agent on the tracker side can create work in Fleet, launch it, and read the result back.

06

Where it fits, and where it does not

The conditions that make Fleet the right answer are specific, and so are the ones that rule it out.

Fits
  • An existing Snowflake footprint, and expanding
  • Data residency, egress, or model provider review has already blocked an artificial intelligence initiative
  • Healthcare, financial services, energy, or government
  • Repetitive, well specified data platform work sitting in a backlog
  • An agent pilot that proved the concept and stalled short of production
Does not fit
  • A licensed tool the organization can self serve
  • Cross functional work management rather than execution
  • No governed platform footprint to host it
  • A requirement to be running next week with no engagement
  • A conversation framed around seat count
07

What is proven, and what is pending

Fleet is early. Its components are not.

Proven
Agentic execution at enterprise scale. IBM Consulting engagements across airlines, healthcare, telecommunications, and consumer goods run orchestrated agents against production work, with results on the record.
Proven
Applications built and run inside Snowflake. Hakkoda has taken public facing applications to production on Snowpark and Streamlit, inside customer accounts, in weeks.
Proven
Automation that returns engineering hours. Pipeline and framework work across healthcare and consumer goods accounts, with confirmed figures behind it.
In motion
First client deployments. Engagements are in progress, including with a major airline, and further client interest is active. Named references follow customer approval.
Pending
Instrumented throughput. Execution volume is measured on the first production workload. Figures publish when that instrumentation lands, not before.
In modeling
Total cost of ownership. Build cost, maintenance ownership, and compute are being modeled against seat and credit pricing to establish the crossover point.
08

What a customer buys

Fleet is not licensed and there is no seat price.

The engagement deploys the harness into the customer's environment and hands over agents already configured for their stack, their coding standards, and their review policy. Pre-configured agent roles are the difference between a framework and something that does useful work in week one. A first workload runs through it before handover, with a runbook.

The harness is the accelerator. The customer specific build on top of it is the work.

The qualifying condition is narrow and easy to test: an artificial intelligence initiative that has already stalled because the work could not leave the account.

09

How to talk about it

Q
Why not just use Jira?
A
Most organizations will keep it. Jira is the system of record for work. Fleet is the execution layer for work that cannot leave the account. The two connect rather than compete.
Q
Atlassian already has agents. What is different here?
A
Location and adjacency. Rovo Dev executes in Atlassian's cloud and reasons over work artifacts. Fleet executes inside the customer's own account, next to the data, the governance layer, and the semantic models. It is a different job in a place the incumbent does not operate.
Q
Is this a licensed product?
A
No, and there is no seat price. Fleet is the harness underneath a build. What a customer buys is the engagement that stands it up and the work that runs on it afterward.
Q
Is it cheaper?
A
The cost shape is different rather than uniformly lower. Seat and credit pricing scales with headcount and usage. Fleet's marginal cost is compute and tokens on infrastructure the organization already owns, against a build cost a licensed product does not carry. The crossover point is being modeled.
Q
Where does it stand today?
A
Client engagements are in progress, including with a major airline, with further interest active. Named references follow customer approval. Separately, every component the harness depends on is already in production. IBM Consulting runs orchestrated agentic execution across client engagements today, and Hakkoda has applications built and running inside Snowflake in client accounts.
Sources

Currency and sourcing

Fleet detail comes from the build itself. Everything referenced about Atlassian is public and dated below.